Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEscudero-Oñate, Carlos
dc.contributor.otherEscudero-Oñate, Carlos - Project manager
dc.contributor.otherEscudero-Oñate, Carlos - Project manager
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-26T08:06:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-01T10:57:01Z
dc.date.available2014-09-26T08:06:04Z
dc.date.available2014-10-01T10:57:01Z
dc.date.issued2014-09
dc.identifier6718
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-577-6453-1
dc.identifier.issn1894-7948
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/222581
dc.description.abstractIn the current edition of the ICP Waters Intercomparison program, 64 laboratories were invited to participate. 33 from 12 different countries accepted the invitation and all the participants submitted results to the Organization. Two sample sets were prepared: one for the determination of major ions and one for heavy metals. This year a slightly acidic sample was prepared to make the intercomparison more relevant for monitoring of acidic waters. The samples of the set AB where slightly spiked with hydrochloric acid to get a pH close to 6. The detailed procedure is described in Appendix B of the document. Based on the general target accuracy of  20 % or the special accuracy limit for pH and conductivity ( 0,2 pH units and  10 % respectively),76 % of the overall results were considered acceptable. This is slightly better than last year, but in line with previous editions. The best results were reported for the analytical variables: conductivity, chloride, calcium, potassium and sodium, with acceptances of 90% or higher. The lowest percentage of acceptable results was observed for alkalinity and nitrate+nitrite-N, where only 26 and 14% of the reported results were acceptable respectively. As observed in earlier intercomparisons, nitrate showed clear signs of unstability and a large variation in values were reported from the participating laboratories. Harmonization of the analytical methods used and of the practical procedures followed, may be the most important way to improve the comparability for these parameters.nb_NO
dc.description.sponsorshipNorwegian Environment Agency
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorsk institutt for vannforskningnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNIVA-rapport;6718
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICP Waters report;120/2014
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/no/*
dc.titleIntercomparison 1428: pH, Conductivity, Alkalinity, NO3-N, Cl, SO4, Ca, Mg, Na, K, TOC, Al, Fe, Mn, Cd, Pb, Cu, Ni, and Zn (ICP Waters report 120/2014)nb_NO
dc.typeResearch reportnb_NO
dc.date.updated2014-09-26T08:06:05Z
dc.rights.holderNorsk institutt for vannforskning/Norwegian Institute for Water Research
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og naturvitenskap: 400nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Mathematics and natural scienses: 400nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber82nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1158365
dc.subject.keywordKvalitetskontroll / Quality Control
dc.subject.keywordOvervåking / Monitoring
dc.subject.keywordPrøvningssammenligning / Intercomparison
dc.subject.keywordSur nedbør / Acid Rain
dc.relation.project10300


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge