Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMoe, Therese Fosholt
dc.contributor.authorBrysting, Anne Krag
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Tom
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Susanne Claudia
dc.contributor.authorKaste, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorHessen, Dag Olav
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-31T13:46:36Z
dc.date.available2018-10-31T13:46:36Z
dc.date.created2013-02-19T08:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationFreshwater Biology. 2013, 58 (1), 114-127.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0046-5070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2570425
dc.description.abstract1. Invasive species can transform aquatic ecosystems, and the nuisance growth of the freshwater macrophyte Juncus bulbosus has become a problem in many lakes and rivers in northern Europe. It affects biodiversity strongly and conflicts with human uses, not least compromising the generation of hydroelectricity. The causes of the proliferation of these massive stands of J. bulbosus are not finally resolved, however. 2. In this study, a wide range of catchment, lake and sediment parameters (n = 34) were assessed for 139 lakes in Southern Norway, with the aim of explaining the presence or absence of J. bulbosus and to assess potential drivers behind its prolific growth. 3. Juncus bulbosus was more often present in lakes with lower pH and phosphate concentrations, and a higher element ratio of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) to total phosphorus (DIN : TotP). 4. Despite the many parameters measured across substantial environmental gradients, none explained nuisance growth. Genetic screening (amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting) of plants from a subset of lakes and additional river sites also showed no genetic differences between the various growth forms. A macrophyte trophic index, however, suggested that the most problematic growth occurred in the most oligotrophic lakes. 5. The lack of consistent patterns may reflect either factors not assessed in our survey, or that the current extension of stands represents a gradual cumulative response over time, not characterised effectively in our snapshot survey. Nevertheless, we can now exclude some putative causes of nuisance growth, including in particular genetics and N‐deposition.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleNuisance growth of Juncus bulbosus: the roles of genetics and environmental drivers tested in a large-scale surveynb_NO
dc.title.alternativeNuisance growth of Juncus bulbosus: the roles of genetics and environmental drivers tested in a large-scale surveynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber114-127nb_NO
dc.source.volume58nb_NO
dc.source.journalFreshwater Biologynb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/fwb.12043
dc.identifier.cristin1011984
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 179569nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7464,30,19,0
cristin.unitcode7464,30,23,0
cristin.unitnameFerskvannsøkologi
cristin.unitnameNedbørfeltprosesser
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel