Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHovind, H.nb_NO
dc.contributor.otherHovind, H. - Project managernb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-01T10:46:25Z
dc.date.available2014-08-01T10:46:25Z
dc.date.issued2001-08nb_NO
dc.identifier4416nb_NO
dc.identifier.isbn82-577-4059-4nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1894-7948nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/211381
dc.descriptionÅrsliste 2001nb_NO
dc.description.abstract77 laboratories received samples for the intercomparison 0115, and 72 laboratories in 26 countries submitted results. Three sample sets were used, one for the determination of major ions, one for organic matter and aluminium fractions, and one for heavy metals. Based on the general target accuracy of ± 20 %, 71 % of the results were considered acceptable. 93 % of the result pairs were acceptable for sodium and 85 % for potassium. For pH only 58 % of the result pairs were acceptable in relation to the extended target accuracy of ± 0.2 units. Normalization of the analytical methods used is necessary to improve the comparability for pH. For the aluminium fractions it was decided not to evaluate the reported results, because of the great spread of the results in combination with very few results for this analytical variable in the samples C and D. Determination of heavy metals was included in the intercomparison for the second time, with fairly good results for copper and nickel. For iron, lead, and zinc the fraction of acceptable result pairs were 41 - 53 %, this low acceptance may be due to the low concentrations used for these metals. For the heavy metals it should be discussed whether an absolute acceptance limit should be used instead of the general target of ± 20 % when the concentrations are close to the detection limit of the recommended method.nb_NO
dc.description.sponsorshipStatens forurensningstilsyn (SFT)nb_NO
dc.publisherNorsk institutt for vannforskningnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNIVA-rapport;4416nb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICP Waters report;64/2001nb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norgenb_NO
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/no/nb_NO
dc.subjectanalysenb_NO
dc.titleIntercomparison 0115: pH, K25, HCO3, NO3+ NO2, Cl, SO4,Ca, Mg, Na, K, total aluminium, aluminium - reactive and nonlabile, TOC, COD-Mn, Fe, Mn, Cd, Pb, Cu, Ni and Zn (ICP Waters report 64/2001)nb_NO
dc.typeResearch reportnb_NO
dc.rights.holderNorsk institutt for vannforskning/Norwegian institute for water researchnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og naturvitenskap: 400nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber81nb_NO
dc.subject.keywordprøvningssammenligningnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordsur nedbørnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordkvalitetskontrollnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordovervåkingnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordacid precipitationnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordintercomparisonnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordqualitynb_NO
dc.subject.keywordcontrolnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordmonitoringnb_NO
dc.relation.projectO-860012nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge