Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHarpenslager, S.F.
dc.contributor.authorThiemer, Kirstine
dc.contributor.authorLevertz, C.
dc.contributor.authorMisteli, B.
dc.contributor.authorSebola, K.M.
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Susanne Claudia
dc.contributor.authorHilt, S.
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T11:56:12Z
dc.date.available2022-09-21T11:56:12Z
dc.date.created2022-08-23T11:51:22Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAquatic Botany. 2022, 182, 103555.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0304-3770
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3020205
dc.description.abstractMass development of macrophytes in freshwater ecosystems is today considered a worldwide problem and substantial resources are spent on macrophyte removal each year. By removing the dominant primary producer, however, this management practice radically changes the ecosystem overnight. Here, we studied short-term effects of the removal of a mass development of free-floating (Pontederia crassipes), submerged (Elodea nuttallii) and emergent (mix of Ludwigia grandiflora and L. peploides) macrophytes on fluxes of CH4 and CO2 in three lakes. In our field experiment, we assigned an impact site where macrophytes were removed, and a control site where vegetation remained. Before and after removal, diffusive fluxes of CO2 and CH4 were determined in lakes dominated by P. crassipes and E. nuttallii, whereas total emission of CH4 was determined in all three case study lakes. Additionally, plant biomass, and physical and chemical parameters were measured before and after removal. While removal of emergent Ludwigia spp. showed no clear effect on total CH4 emission, removal of submerged E. nuttallii reduced both CO2 fixation and total CH4 emission. Removal of free-floating P. crassipes, on the other hand, increased CH4 fluxes and stimulated phytoplankton blooms. The lack of a universal response across our case study lakes suggests that both macrophyte life forms and environmental parameters can be important factors determining effects of removal. Additionally, indirect effects of macrophyte removal on temperature and dissolved oxygen can help to explain carbon emissions. Long-term effects should be studied to allow development of sustainable management practices.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleShort-term effects of macrophyte removal on emission of CO2 and CH4 in shallow lakesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.volume182en_US
dc.source.journalAquatic Botanyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquabot.2022.103555
dc.identifier.cristin2045273
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 297202en_US
dc.source.articlenumber103555en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal