Stressors affecting the ecological status of temporary rivers in the Mediterranean region
Lorenz, Armin W.; Kaijser, Willem; Acuña, Vicenç; Austnes, Kari; Bonada, Nuria; Dörflinger, Gerald; Ferreira, Teresa; Karaouzas, Ioannis; Rico, Andreu; Hering, Daniel
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Accepted version
View/ Open
Date
2023Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Publikasjoner fra Cristin - NIVA [2255]
- Scientific publications [1254]
Original version
Science of the Total Environment. 2023, 903, 166254. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166254Abstract
Temporary rivers are widespread in the Mediterranean region and impose a challenge for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and other environmental regulations. Surprisingly, an overarching analysis of their ecological status and the stressors affecting them is yet missing. We compiled data on the ecological status of 1504 temporary rivers in seven European Mediterranean region countries and related their ecological status (1) to publicly available data on pressures from the European WISE-WFD dataset, and (2) to seven more specific stressors modelled on a sub-catchment scale. More than 50 % of the temporary water bodies in the Mediterranean countries reached good or even high ecological status. In general, status classes derived from phytobenthos and macrophyte assessment were higher than those derived from the assessment of benthic invertebrates or fish. Of the more generally defined pressures reported to the WISE-WFD database, the most relevant for temporary rivers were ‘diffuse agricultural’ and ‘point urban waste water’. Of the modelled more specific stressors, agricultural land use best explained overall ecological status, followed by total nitrogen load, and urban land use, while toxic substances, total phosphorus load and hydrological stressors were less relevant. However, stressors differed in relevance, with total nitrogen being most important for macrophytes, and agricultural land use for phytobenthos, benthic invertebrates and fish. For macrophytes, ecological quality increased with stressor intensity. The results underline the overarching effect of land use intensity for the ecological status of temporary water bodies. However, assessment results do not sufficiently reflect hydrological stress, most likely as the biological indicators used to evaluate these systems were designed for perennial water bodies and thus mainly target land use and nutrient impacts. We conclude that biomonitoring systems need to be updated or newly developed to better account for the specific situation of temporary water bodies.