Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHenriksen, A.nb_NO
dc.contributor.otherHenriksen, A. - Project managernb_NO
dc.coverage.spatialNorgenb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-01T10:42:53Z
dc.date.available2014-08-01T10:42:53Z
dc.date.issued1998nb_NO
dc.identifier3942nb_NO
dc.identifier.isbn82-577-3533-7nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1894-7948nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/210140
dc.description.abstractThe quality of the critical load data for so-called "binding grid cells" in Norway has been checked. These are the following EMEP-grids (150km x 150 km): 16,20 16,21 16,30 17,19 17,20 and 18,21. Critical loads have been established for lakes in each 1o longitude by 0.5o latitude grid divided into 16 sub-grids ("NIVA grids", 12 km x 12 km). There are available data for forest soils in 720 grids and surface waters for 2305 grids. Surface waters are considered to be the most sensitive ecosystem in Norway, which is clearly indicated by the fact that for 93% of the grids with values for both ecosystems surface waters are more sensitive than forest soil. The soil critical loads do not influence the critical load percentile distributions significantly in the low range. The critical loads in Norwegian grids are well documented, especially in the most heavily affected areas in southern Norway and they compare well with the derived dose/response function for fish damage and critical load exceedance. For the "binding grid cells" there is additional lake data available to the number of "NIVA grids" in the EMEP-grid. The Birkenes grid (17,20) is the most critical grid. It covers the area of Norway most subjected to acidification, and where the earliest reliable records of fish kills and fish decline were recorded. Since this grid represents an area with the best documentation in Norway with respect fish damage and water chemistry (11% of the lakes analysed) we consider the critical load data for this grid to be the most reliable one in Norway. The lake percentiles for the binding grid cells are generally a little lower than those given by the database submitted to the CCE. This indicates that the lakes selected for the CCE-database slightly overestimate the critical load distribution in the grid. Thus, the critical loads are in fact lower than those reported to the CCE. There is therefore no justification for exclusion of any ecosystem data from the Norwegian critical load database.nb_NO
dc.description.sponsorshipMiljøverndepartementet (MD)nb_NO
dc.publisherNorsk institutt for vannforskningnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNIVA-rapport;3942nb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norgenb_NO
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/no/nb_NO
dc.subjectsur nedbørnb_NO
dc.titleBinding grid cells - Norway An evaluationnb_NO
dc.typeResearch reportnb_NO
dc.rights.holderNorsk institutt for vannforskning/Norwegian institute for water researchnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og naturvitenskap: 400nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber16nb_NO
dc.subject.keywordsur nedbørnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordtålegrensenb_NO
dc.subject.keywordinnsjøernb_NO
dc.subject.keywordfiskeskadernb_NO
dc.subject.keywordacidic depositionnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordcritical loadsnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordlakesnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordfishnb_NO
dc.subject.keyworddamagesnb_NO
dc.relation.projectO-89210nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge