Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHovind, H.nb_NO
dc.contributor.otherHovind, H. - Project managernb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-01T10:45:33Z
dc.date.available2014-08-01T10:45:33Z
dc.date.issued2000-09nb_NO
dc.identifier4281nb_NO
dc.identifier.isbn82-577-3910-3nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1894-7948nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/210996
dc.descriptionÅrsliste 2000nb_NO
dc.description.abstract71 laboratories received samples for the intercomparison 0014, and 65 laboratories in 26 countries submitted results. Three sample sets were used, one for the determination of major ions, one for organic matter and aluminium fractions, and one for heavy metals. Based on the general target accuracy of ± 20%, 63% of the results were considered acceptable. About 90% of the results pairs were acceptable for sodium and dissolved organic carbon. For pH only 57% of the result pairs were acceptable i relation to the extended target accuracy of ± 0.2 units. For nitrate + nitrite it was decided not to evaluate the reported results, because of the instability of this analytical variable in the samples A and B. Determination of heavy metals was included in the intercomparison for the first time, with fairly good results for iron and manganese. For lead, nickel and zinc where less than 50% of the results were acceptable, may be due to the low concentrations used for these metals. Normalization of the analytical methods used is necessary to improve the comparability for pH. For the heavy metals it should be discussed whether an absolute acceptance limit should be used instead of the general target of ± 20% when the concentrations are close to the detection limit of the recommended method.nb_NO
dc.description.sponsorshipNorwegian Pollution Control Authoritynb_NO
dc.publisherNorsk institutt for vannforskningnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNIVA-rapport;4281nb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICP Waters report;55/2000nb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norgenb_NO
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/no/nb_NO
dc.subjectanalysenb_NO
dc.titleIntercomparison 0014: pH, Cond, HCO3, NO3+ NO2, Cl, SO4,Ca, Mg, Na, K, total-aluminium, aluminium - reactive and nonlabile, DOC, COD-Mn, Fe, Mn, Cd, Pb, Cu, Ni and Zn (ICP Waters report 55/2000)nb_NO
dc.typeResearch reportnb_NO
dc.rights.holderNorsk institutt for vannforskning/Norwegian institute for water researchnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og naturvitenskap: 400nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber80nb_NO
dc.subject.keywordprøvningssammenligningnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordsur nedbørnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordkvalitetskontrollnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordovervåkingnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordacid precipitationnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordintercomparisonnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordqualitynb_NO
dc.subject.keywordcontrolnb_NO
dc.subject.keywordmonitoringnb_NO
dc.relation.projectO-86001-2nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 3.0 Norge