Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBorja, Angel
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Jesper H
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorCarstensen, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorHalpern, Benjamin S.
dc.contributor.authorHeiskanen, Anna-Stiina
dc.contributor.authorKorpinen, Samuli
dc.contributor.authorLowndes, Julia S. Stewart
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Georg
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Ezpeleta, Naiara
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T11:19:22Z
dc.date.available2018-08-02T11:19:22Z
dc.date.created2017-03-22T15:07:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Marine Science. 2016, 3, 20: 20.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2507263
dc.description.abstractTraditional and emerging human activities are increasingly putting pressures on marine ecosystems and impacting their ability to sustain ecological and human communities. To evaluate the health status of marine ecosystems we need a science-based, integrated Ecosystem Approach, that incorporates knowledge of ecosystem function and services provided that can be used to track how management decisions change the health of marine ecosystems. Although many methods have been developed to assess the status of single components of the ecosystem, few exist for assessing multiple ecosystem components in a holistic way. To undertake such an integrative assessment, it is necessary to understand the response of marine systems to human pressures. Hence, innovative monitoring is needed to obtain data to determine the health of large marine areas, and in an holistic way. Here we review five existing methods that address both of these needs(monitoring and assessment): the Ecosystem Health Assessment Tool; a method for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in the Bay of Biscay; the Ocean Health Index (OHI); the Marine Biodiversity Assessment Tool, and the Nested Environmental status Assessment Tool. We have highlighted their main characteristics and analyzing their commonalities and differences, in terms of: use of the Ecosystem Approach; inclusion of multiple components in the assessment; use of reference conditions; use of integrative assessments; use of arange of values to capture the status; weighting ecosystem components when integrating; determine the uncertainty; ensure spatial and temporal comparability; use of robust monitoring approaches, and address pressures and impacts. Ultimately, for any ecosystem assessment to be effective it needs to be: transparent and repeatable and, in order to inform marine management, the results should be easy to communicate to wide audiences, including scientists, managers, and policy makers.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherFrontiers Medianb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleOverview of Integrative Assessment of Marine Systems: The Ecosystem Approach in Practicenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2016 Borja, Elliott, Andersen, Berg, Carstensen, Halpern, Heiskanen, Korpinen, Lowndes, Martin and Rodriguez-Ezpeleta.nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber20nb_NO
dc.source.volume3nb_NO
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Marine Sciencenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmars.2016.00020
dc.identifier.cristin1460399
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/308392nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7464,60,0,0
cristin.unitnameNIVA Danmark
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal