Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBorja, Angel
dc.contributor.authorPrins, Theo C.
dc.contributor.authorSimboura, Nomiki
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Jesper Harbo
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Joao-Carlos
dc.contributor.authorNeto, Joao M.
dc.contributor.authorPapadopoulou, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorReker, Johnny
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Heliana
dc.contributor.authorUusitalo, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T13:23:02Z
dc.date.available2018-08-02T13:23:02Z
dc.date.created2015-01-26T13:09:11Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Marine Science. 2014, 1, 20: 72.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2507323
dc.description.abstractAssessing the environmental status of marine ecosystems is useful when communicating key messages to policy makers or the society, reducing the complex information of the multiple ecosystem and biodiversity components and their important spatial and temporal variability into manageable units. Taking into account the ecosystem components to be addressed(e.g., biological, chemical, physical), the numerous biodiversity elements to be assessed(e.g., from microbes to sea mammals), the different indicators needed to be studied(e.g., in Europe, 56 indicators of status have been selected), and the different assessment scales to be undertaken(e.g., from local to regional seascale), some criteria to define spatial scales and some guidance on aggregating and integrating information is needed. We have reviewed, from ecological and management perspectives, the approaches for aggregating and integrating currently available for marine status assessment in Europe and other regions of the world. Advantages and shortcomings of the different alternatives are highlighted. We provide some guidance on the steps toward defining rules for aggregation and integration of information at multiple levels of ecosystem organization, providing recommendations on when using specific rules in the assessment. A main conclusion is that any integration principle used should be ecologically-relevant, transparent and well documented, in order to make it comparable across different geographic regions.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherFrontiers Medianb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTales from a thousand and one ways to integrate marine ecosystem components when assessing the environmental statusnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2014 Borja, Prins, Simboura, Andersen, Berg, Marques, Neto, Papadopoulou, Reker, Teixeira and Uusitalo.nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber20nb_NO
dc.source.volume1nb_NO
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Marine Sciencenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmars.2014.00072
dc.identifier.cristin1207268
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/308392nb_NO
dc.relation.projectEU/ENV.D2/FRA/2012/0019nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7464,60,0,0
cristin.unitnameNIVA Danmark
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal