Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Susanne C
dc.contributor.authorSample, James E
dc.contributor.authorMoe, S. Jannicke
dc.contributor.authorPetrin, Zlatko
dc.contributor.authorMeissner, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHering, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T13:12:42Z
dc.date.available2019-05-29T13:12:42Z
dc.date.created2018-07-31T15:04:56Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1936-0584
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2599464
dc.descriptionEmbargo until 11 June 2019nb_NO
dc.description.abstractVariability in riverine flow regimes is important for aquatic biodiversity. However, across the globe, management of water resources has altered natural flow dynamics. We explored relationships between flow regime (calculated from 3 years' daily averaged discharge), and water chemistry, benthic algae, as well as macroinvertebrate datasets from 64 sites across Germany and Norway. To deal with multicollinearity while maintaining interpretability, we performed principal component (PC) analyses for each dataset in each country and selected the metric with the highest absolute loading on each PC to represent that PC. We then used L1‐regularized (lasso) regression to link differences in water chemistry and hydrology to differences in ecology and compared this approach with the more popular best‐subsets ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. The results obtained using lasso regression were broadly comparable to those produced by best‐subsets OLS, but the lasso approach “rejected” more models than the best‐subsets approach. When lasso identified a plausible model, it was the same or similar to the best model found by best‐subsets OLS. The lasso method was more “discerning”, that is, it identified a smaller number of potentially interesting models, whereas best‐subsets regression seemed to find “too many” relationships. We identified two response variables that were potentially affected by regulation: (a) River regulation may lead to higher cyanobacterial abundance, possibly via a less variable flow regime; (b) reduced flow variability may lead to a reduced proportion of grazers and scrapers, possibly indicating a shift towards an increased importance of heterotrophic energy sources in ecosystems with less variable flows. cyanobacteria, flow variability, hydrology, indicators of hydrological alteration, macrozoobenthos, periphyton, rivernb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleUnravelling the effect of flow regime on macroinvertebrates and benthic algae in regulated versus unregulated streamsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume11nb_NO
dc.source.journalEcohydrologynb_NO
dc.source.issue7nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eco.1996
dc.identifier.cristin1599217
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/603378nb_NO
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 221398nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7464,30,19,0
cristin.unitcode7464,20,18,0
cristin.unitcode7464,30,23,0
cristin.unitnameFerskvannsøkologi
cristin.unitnameMiljøinformatikk
cristin.unitnameNedbørfeltprosesser
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel