Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSamanipour, Saer
dc.contributor.authorBaz-Lomba, Jose A
dc.contributor.authorReid, Malcolm J
dc.contributor.authorCiceri, Elena
dc.contributor.authorRowland, Steven
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Per
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Kevin V
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-03T07:37:36Z
dc.date.available2019-06-03T07:37:36Z
dc.date.created2018-12-16T20:08:49Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAnalytica Chimica Acta. 2018, 1025, 92-98.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0003-2670
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2599613
dc.description.abstractThe comprehensive extraction recovery assessment of organic analytes from complex samples such as oil field produced water (PW) is a challenging task. A targeted approach is usually used for recovery and determination of compounds in these types of analysis. Here we suggest a more comprehensive and less biased approach for the extraction recovery assessment of complex samples. This method combines conventional targeted analysis with a non-targeted approach to evaluate the extraction recovery of complex mixtures. Three generic extraction methods: liquid-liquid extraction (Lq), and solid phase extraction using HLB cartridges (HLB), and the combination of ENV+ and C8 (ENV) cartridges, were selected for evaluation. PW was divided into three parts: non-spiked, spiked level 1, and spiked level 2 for analysis. The spiked samples were used for targeted evaluation of extraction recoveries of 65 added target analytes comprising alkanes, phenols, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, producing absolute recoveries. The non-spiked samples were used for the non-targeted approach, which used a combination of the F-ratio method and apex detection algorithm. Targeted analysis showed that the use of ENV cartridges and the Lq method performed better than use of HLB cartridges, producing absolute recoveries of 53.1 ± 15.2 for ENV and 46.8 ± 13.2 for Lq versus 19.7 ± 6.7 for HLB. These two methods appeared to produce statistically similar results for recoveries of analytes, whereas they were both different from the produced recoveries via the HLB method. The non-targeted approach captured unique features that were specific to each extraction method. This approach generated 26 unique features (mass spectral ions), which were significantly different between samples and were relevant in differentiating each extract from each method. Using a combination of these targeted and non-targeted methods we evaluated the extraction recoveries of the three extraction methods for analysis of PW.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAssessing sample extraction efficiencies for the analysis of complex unresolved mixtures of organic pollutants: A comprehensive non-target approachnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2018 Elseviernb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber92-98nb_NO
dc.source.volume1025nb_NO
dc.source.journalAnalytica Chimica Actanb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aca.2018.04.020
dc.identifier.cristin1643767
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 243720nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7464,30,21,0
cristin.unitnameMiljøkjemi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal