Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPosch, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorAherne, Julian
dc.contributor.authorMoldan, Filip
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Chris D.
dc.contributor.authorForsius, Martin
dc.contributor.authorLarssen, Thorjørn
dc.contributor.authorHelliwell, Rachel C.
dc.contributor.authorCosby, B Jack
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T07:31:26Z
dc.date.available2020-02-04T07:31:26Z
dc.date.created2019-07-21T16:09:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Technology. 2019, 53 (9), 5062-5070.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0013-936X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2639430
dc.descriptionEmbargo until 29 March 2020nb_NO
dc.description.abstractThe target load concept is an extension of the critical load concept of air pollution inputs to ecosystems. The advantage of target loads over critical loads is that one can define the deposition and the point in time (target year) when the critical (chemical) limit is no longer violated. This information on the timing of recovery requires dynamic modeling. Using a well-documented dynamic model, target loads for acidic deposition were determined for 848 surface waters across Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom for the target year 2050. In the majority of sites (n = 675), the critical ANC-limit was predicted to be achieved by 2050; however, for 127 sites, target loads were determined. In addition, 46 sites were infeasible, i.e., even a reduction of anthropogenic deposition to zero would not achieve the limit by 2050. The average maximum target load for sulfur was 38% lower than the respective critical load across the study lakes (n = 127). Target loads on a large regional scale can inform effects-based emission reduction policies; the current assessment suggests that reductions beyond the Gothenburg Protocol are required to ensure surface water recovery from acidification by 2050.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societynb_NO
dc.titleDynamic Modeling and Target Loads of Sulfur and Nitrogen for Surface Waters in Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdomnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber5062-5070nb_NO
dc.source.volume53nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Science and Technologynb_NO
dc.source.issue9nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.est.8b06356
dc.identifier.cristin1712224
cristin.unitcode7464,30,0,0
cristin.unitnameFagsenter for ferskvannsmiljø
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel