Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSteindal, Eirik Hovland
dc.contributor.authorGrung, Merete
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T07:28:54Z
dc.date.available2021-07-14T07:28:54Z
dc.date.created2021-02-15T16:54:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2021, 17 (4), 835-851.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1551-3777
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2764339
dc.description.abstractThe Nordic countries are in the forefront of international chemical regulation and management by actively developing the domestic policy framework, while simultaneously pushing for more stringent control internationally. Norway, Sweden, and Denmark have been particularly progressive in the regulation of the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Restriction proposals have been developed under the EU Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and PFAS have been nominated for global restriction under the Stockholm Convention. A key tool in their work has been the product registries (PRs), where all chemicals imported and produced over a certain reporting limit must be registered by the importers and/or producers. In recent years these PRs have been facing opposition, predominantly from the industry. Simultaneously, and in some contrast, several EU countries are mobilizing for measures to control PFAS as a group. We explored the role of PRs in national and international chemical management. By analyzing the Norwegian PFAS data (2009–2017) reported by industry to the government we observed changes in use and temporal trends. A diversification in use and substitutions to alternative PFAS emerged when new policies were developed, representing a challenge for future control and reduction efforts. Instead of loosening up on reporting obligations, as advocated by some industry representatives, our analysis of the PFAS group argues that governments would benefit from a tighter reporting scheme of problematic compound groups. A comprehensive overview of use, production, and import would contribute to more effective control, thereby saving society and the environment from serious damage and tremendous costs. The Nordic PRs will continue to be important supplements to REACH registration and an indispensable tool for future both national and international regulation on PFAS and other hazardous substances.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleManagement of PFAS with the Aid of Chemical Product Registries — An Indispensable Tool for Future Control of Hazardous Substancesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber835-851en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.journalIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Managementen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4380
dc.identifier.cristin1890071
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 160016en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal