Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTilot, Virginie
dc.contributor.authorWillaert, Klaas
dc.contributor.authorGuilloux, Bleuenn
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wenting
dc.contributor.authorMulalap, Clement Y.
dc.contributor.authorGaulme, Francois
dc.contributor.authorBambridge, Tamatoa
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Kimberley
dc.contributor.authorDahl, Arthur
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-16T10:10:23Z
dc.date.available2021-07-16T10:10:23Z
dc.date.created2021-04-14T11:37:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Marine Science. 2021, 8, 637938.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2764649
dc.description.abstractIn many of the Pacific Islands, local communities have long-held cultural and spiritual attachments to the sea, in particular to species and specific marine areas, processes, habitats, islands, and natural seabed formations. Traditional knowledge, customary marine management approaches and integrated relationships between biodiversity, ecosystems and local communities promote conservation and ensure that marine benefits are reaped in a holistic, sustainable and equitable manner. However, the interaction between local traditional knowledge, contemporary scientific approaches to marine resource management and specific regulatory frameworks has often been challenging. To some extent, the value of community practices and customary law, which have provided an incentive for regional cooperation and coordination around ocean governance, is acknowledged in several legal systems in the Pacific and a number of regional and international instruments, but this important connection can be further enhanced. In this article we present a science-based overview of the marine habitats that would be affected by deep seabed mining (DSM) along with an analysis of some traditional dimensions and cultural/societal aspects of marine resource management. We then assess whether the applicable legal frameworks at different levels attach sufficient importance to these traditional dimensions and to the human and societal aspects of seabed (mineral) resource management in the region. On the basis of this analysis, we identify best practices and formulate recommendations with regard to the current regulatory frameworks and seabed resource management approaches. Indeed, the policies and practices developed in the Pacific could well serve as a suitable model elsewhere to reconcile commercial, ecological, cultural and social values within the context of deep sea mineral exploitation in addition to sustaining the Human Well-being and Sustainable Livelihoods (HWSL) of the Pacific communities and the health of the Global Ocean.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTraditional Dimensions of Seabed Resource Management in the Context of Deep Sea Mining in the Pacific: Learning From the Socio-Ecological Interconnectivity Between Island Communities and the Ocean Realmen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2021 Tilot, Willaert, Guilloux, Chen, Mulalap, Gaulme, Bambridge, Peters and Dahl.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber27en_US
dc.source.volume8en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Marine Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmars.2021.637938
dc.identifier.cristin1903978
dc.source.articlenumber637938en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal