Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAllan, Ian John
dc.contributor.authorVrana, Branislav
dc.contributor.authorde Weert, Jasperien
dc.contributor.authorKringstad, Alfhild
dc.contributor.authorRuus, Anders
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Guttorm
dc.contributor.authorTerentjev, Petr
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Norman Whitaker
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-18T12:39:54Z
dc.date.available2022-01-18T12:39:54Z
dc.date.created2021-12-13T09:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports. 2021, 11, 11231.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2837940
dc.description.abstractThe identification and prioritisation of water bodies presenting elevated levels of anthropogenic chemicals is a key aspect of environmental monitoring programmes. Albeit this is challenging owing to geographical scales, choice of indicator aquatic species used for chemical monitoring, and inherent need for an understanding of contaminant fate and distribution in the environment. Here, we propose an innovative methodology for identifying and ranking water bodies according to their levels of hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs) in water. This is based on a unique passive sampling dataset acquired over a 10-year period with silicone rubber exposures in surface water bodies across Europe. We show with these data that, far from point sources of contamination, levels of hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and pentachlorobenzene (PeCB) in water approach equilibrium with atmospheric concentrations near the air/water surface. This results in a relatively constant ratio of their concentrations in the water phase. This, in turn, allows us to (i) identify sites of contamination with either of the two chemicals when the HCB/PeCB ratio deviates from theory and (ii) define benchmark levels of other HOCs in surface water against those of HCB and/or PeCB. For two polychlorinated biphenyls (congener 28 and 52) used as model chemicals, differences in contamination levels between the more contaminated and pristine sites are wider than differences in HCB and PeCB concentrations endorsing the benchmarking procedure.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNatureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePassive sampling and benchmarking to rank HOC levels in the aquatic environmenten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Te Author(s) 2021en_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalScientific Reportsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-021-90457-3
dc.identifier.cristin1967597
dc.source.articlenumber11231en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal