Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJensen, Mads Reinholdt
dc.contributor.authorEgelyng Sigsgaard, Eva
dc.contributor.authorAgersnap, Sune
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Jes Jessen
dc.contributor.authorBaattrup-Pedersen, Annette
dc.contributor.authorWiberg-Larsen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorThomsen, Philip Francis
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T08:52:06Z
dc.date.available2022-03-11T08:52:06Z
dc.date.created2022-02-17T12:16:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental DNA. 2021, 3 (4), 861-876.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2637-4943
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984505
dc.description.abstractMacroinvertebrate communities are crucial for biodiversity monitoring and assessment of ecological status in stream ecosystems. However, traditional monitoring approaches require intensive sampling and rely on invasive morphological identifications that are time-consuming and dependent on taxonomic expertise. Importantly, sampling is often only carried out once in a year, namely during late winter–spring, where most indicator taxa have larval stages in the streams. Hence, species with divergent phenology might not be detected. Here, we use environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of filtered water samples collected in both spring and autumn from five streams in Denmark to address seasonal turnover in community composition of stream macroinvertebrates. We find that eDNA read data from the same stream sampling site clearly show different communities in spring and autumn, respectively. For three of the five streams, season even appears to be a more important factor than sampling site for explaining the variation in community composition. Finally, we compare eDNA data with a near-decadal dataset of taxon occurrences in the same five streams based on kick sampling conducted through a national monitoring program. This comparison reveals an overlap in species composition, but also that the two approaches provide complementary rather than identical insights into community composition. Our study demonstrates that aquatic eDNA metabarcoding is useful for species detection across highly diverse taxa and for identifying seasonal patterns in community composition of freshwater macroinvertebrates. Thus, our results have important implications for both fundamental research in aquatic ecology and for applied biomonitoring.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSeasonal turnover in community composition of stream-associated macroinvertebrates inferred from freshwater environmental DNA metabarcodingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber861-876en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironmental DNAen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/edn3.193
dc.identifier.cristin2002796
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal