Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWennberg, Aina Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorMeland, Sondre
dc.contributor.authorGrung, Merete
dc.contributor.authorLillicrap, Adam David
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T10:09:49Z
dc.date.available2022-07-12T10:09:49Z
dc.date.created2022-04-13T09:17:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationChemosphere. 2022, 300, 134476.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3004642
dc.description.abstractThe recommended test for assessing if a chemical can be biodegraded in the marine environment is performed according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Marine biodegradation test guideline (OECD 306). However, this test is known to generate highly variable test results when comparing interlaboratory test results for the same compound. One reason can be the relatively low bacterial content compared to the inoculum used for OECD readily biodegradation tests (OECD 301). Some of the variability in data obtained from OECD 306 tests can also be due to the flexibility on how to store the seawater inoculum before starting a test. Another variable in the seawater inoculum is the source of seawater used by different laboratories, i.e., geographical location and anthropogenic activities at the source. In this study, the effect of aging seawater and the source of seawater (sample time and depth) were investigated to determine differences in the biodegradation of the reference compound aniline. Aging the seawater before starting the test is recommended in OECD 306 to reduce the background levels of organic carbon in the water. However, it also functions to acclimatize the bacterial community from the environmental source temperature to the test temperature (normally 20 °C). Herein, the microbial community was monitored using flowcytometer during the aging process. As expected, the microbial community changed over time. In one experiment, aging significantly improved the biodegradation of aniline, while in two experiments, there was no significant difference in biodegradation. Interestingly however, there was significant variability in the biodegradation of aniline between sampling seasons and depths, even when all experiments were performed in the same lab, by the same operator and seawater obtained from the same source. This highlights the need for a more robust and consistent microbial inoculum source to reduce variability in seawater biodegradation tests.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUnravelling reasons for variability in the OECD 306 marine biodegradation testen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber9en_US
dc.source.volume300en_US
dc.source.journalChemosphereen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134476
dc.identifier.cristin2017128
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 160016en_US
dc.source.articlenumber134476en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal