Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMisteli, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorPannard, Alexandrine
dc.contributor.authorAasland, Eirin
dc.contributor.authorHarpenslager, Sarah Faye
dc.contributor.authorMotitsoe, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorThiemer, Kirstine
dc.contributor.authorLlopis, Stéphanie
dc.contributor.authorCoetzee, Julie
dc.contributor.authorHilt, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, Jan
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Susanne Claudia
dc.contributor.authorPiscart, Christophe
dc.contributor.authorThiébaut, Gabrielle
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T05:54:22Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T05:54:22Z
dc.date.created2022-10-21T07:59:07Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Management. 2022, 325, Part A, 116442 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3028063
dc.descriptionEmbargo until October 13, 2024en_US
dc.description.abstractMass development of macrophytes is an increasing problem in many aquatic systems worldwide. Dense mats of macrophytes can negatively affect activities like boating, fishing or hydropower production and one of the management measures often applied is mechanical removal. In this study, we analyzed the effect of mechanical macrophyte removal on phytoplankton, zooplankton, and macroinvertebrate (pelagic and benthic samples) assemblages. Our study covered five sites in four countries in Europe and Africa with highly variable characteristics. In all sites, dense mats of different macrophyte species (Juncus bulbosus in a river in Norway; a mix of native macrophytes in a German river, Elodea nuttallii in a lake in Germany, Ludwigia spp. In a French lake and Pontederia crassipes in a South African lake) are problematic and mechanical removal was applied. In every country, we repeated the same BACI (Before-After-Control-Impact) design, including “before”, “one week after”, and “six weeks after” sampling in a control and an impact section. Repeating the same experimental design at all sites allowed us to disentangle common effects across all sites from site-specific effects. For each taxonomic group, we analyzed three structural and three functional parameters, which we combined in a scoring system. Overall, the removal of macrophytes negatively affected biodiversity, in particular of zooplankton and macroinvertebrate assemblages. In contrast, plant removal had positive effects on the phytoplankton assemblages. Effects were more pronounced one week after removal than six weeks after. Consequently, we suggest a stronger consideration of the effect of plant removal on biodiversity to arrive at more sustainable management practices in the future.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleShort-term effects of macrophyte removal on aquatic biodiversity in rivers and lakesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber10en_US
dc.source.volume325, Part Aen_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Environmental Managementen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116442
dc.identifier.cristin2063463
dc.source.articlenumber116442en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal