Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBaattrup-Pedersen, Annette
dc.contributor.authorAlnoe, Anette Baisner
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Jes Jessen
dc.contributor.authorLevi, Peter S.
dc.contributor.authorFriberg, Nikolai
dc.contributor.authorRiis, Tenna
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T10:34:49Z
dc.date.available2023-03-10T10:34:49Z
dc.date.created2022-10-25T14:28:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEcological Engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology. 2022, 184 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0925-8574
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3057657
dc.description.abstractRestoration has been increasingly applied over the last decades as a way to improve the ecological conditions in stream ecosystems, but documentation of the impact of restoration on ecosystem functions is sparse. Here, we applied a space-for-time approach to explore effects of stream restoration on metabolism and organic matter decomposition in lowland agricultural streams. We included stream reaches that were restored >10 years ago and compared ecosystem functioning in these streams with those in channelized and naturally meandering stream reaches from the same geographical region. Specifically, we tested the following hypotheses: 1) rates of stream metabolism (gross primary production, GPP, and ecosystem respiration, ER) and organic matter decomposition in restored reaches resemble rates in naturally meandering reaches more than rates in channelized stream reaches and 2) higher resemblance in ecosystem metabolism and organic matter decomposition between restored reaches and meandering reaches can be attributed to the improved physical habitat conditions in the restored stream reaches. Overall, we did not find that stream metabolism or organic matter decomposition differed among restored, channelized and naturally meandering stream reaches even though habitat conditions differed among the three stream types. Instead, we found a large variation in ecosystem function characteristics across all sites. When analyzing all stream types combined, we found that GPP increased with increasing plant coverage and that ER increased with increasing stream size and with the coverage of coarse substratum on the stream bottom. Organic matter decomposition, on the other hand, only slightly increased with the number of plant species and declined with increasing concentrations of nutrients. Overall, our findings suggest that physical habitat improvements in restored stream reaches can affect ecosystem functions, but also that the restoration outcome is context-dependent since many of the physical characteristics playing a role for the measured functions were only to some extent affected by the restoration and/or clouded by interference with factors operating at a larger-scale.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleStream restoration and ecosystem functioning in lowland streamsen_US
dc.title.alternativeStream restoration and ecosystem functioning in lowland streamsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors
dc.source.pagenumber9en_US
dc.source.volume184en_US
dc.source.journalEcological Engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106782
dc.identifier.cristin2064891
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/282656en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/101036337en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal