Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorClayer, Francois
dc.contributor.authorJackson-Blake, Leah
dc.contributor.authorMercado-Bettín, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorShikhani, Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorFrench, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Tadhg
dc.contributor.authorSample, James
dc.contributor.authorNorling, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorFrias, Maria-Dolores
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, Sixto
dc.contributor.authorde Eyto, Elvira
dc.contributor.authorJennings, Eleanor
dc.contributor.authorRinke, Karsten
dc.contributor.authorvan der Linden, Leon
dc.contributor.authorMarcé, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T08:35:47Z
dc.date.available2023-04-19T08:35:47Z
dc.date.created2023-04-11T14:35:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationHydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). 2023, 27 (6), 1361-1381.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1027-5606
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3063732
dc.description.abstractDespite high potential benefits, the development of seasonal forecasting tools in the water sector has been slower than in other sectors. Here we assess the skill of seasonal forecasting tools for lakes and reservoirs set up at four sites in Australia and Europe. These tools consist of coupled hydrological catchment and lake models forced with seasonal meteorological forecast ensembles to provide probabilistic predictions of seasonal anomalies in water discharge, temperature and ice-off. Successful implementation requires a rigorous assessment of the tools' predictive skill and an apportionment of the predictability between legacy effects and input forcing data. To this end, models were forced with two meteorological datasets from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the seasonal forecasting system, SEAS5, with 3-month lead times and the ERA5 reanalysis. Historical skill was assessed by comparing both model outputs, i.e. seasonal lake hindcasts (forced with SEAS5), and pseudo-observations (forced with ERA5). The skill of the seasonal lake hindcasts was generally low although higher than the reference hindcasts, i.e. pseudo-observations, at some sites for certain combinations of season and variable. The SEAS5 meteorological predictions showed less skill than the lake hindcasts. In fact, skilful lake hindcasts identified for selected seasons and variables were not always synchronous with skilful SEAS5 meteorological hindcasts, raising questions on the source of the predictability. A set of sensitivity analyses showed that most of the forecasting skill originates from legacy effects, although during winter and spring in Norway some skill was coming from SEAS5 over the 3-month target season. When SEAS5 hindcasts were skilful, additional predictive skill originates from the interaction between legacy and SEAS5 skill. We conclude that lake forecasts forced with an ensemble of boundary conditions resampled from historical meteorology are currently likely to yield higher-quality forecasts in most cases.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSources of skill in lake temperature, discharge and ice-off seasonal forecasting toolsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1361-1381en_US
dc.source.volume27en_US
dc.source.journalHydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS)en_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/hess-27-1361-2023
dc.identifier.cristin2140028
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 274208en_US
dc.relation.projectEU/690462en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal