Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSamanipour, Saer
dc.contributor.authorKaserzon, Sarit
dc.contributor.authorVijayasarathy, Soumini
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Hui
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Phillip
dc.contributor.authorReid, Malcolm James
dc.contributor.authorJochen, Mueller
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Kevin V
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-24T12:23:21Z
dc.date.available2019-09-24T12:23:21Z
dc.date.created2019-03-28T13:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationTalanta. 2019, 195, 426-432.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0039-9140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2618524
dc.descriptionEmbargo until 15 Nov 2020.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractGuaranteeing clean drinking water to the global population is becoming more challenging, because of the cases of water scarcity across the globe, growing population, and increased chemical footprint of this population. Existing targeted strategies for hazard monitoring in drinking water are not adequate to handle such diverse and multidimensional stressors. In the current study, we have developed, validated, and tested a machine learning algorithm based on the data produced via non-targeted liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) for the identification of potential chemical hazards in drinking water. The machine learning algorithm consisted of a composite statistical model including an unsupervised component (i.e. principal component analysis PCA) and a supervised one (i.e. partial least square discrimination analysis PLS-DA). This model was trained using a training set of 20 drinking water samples previously tested via conventional suspect screening. The developed model was validated using a validation set of 20 drinking water samples of which 4 were spiked with 15 labeled standards at four different concentration levels. The model successfully detected all of the added analytes in the four spiked samples without producing any cases of false detection. The same validation set was processed via conventional trend analysis in order to cross validate the composite model. The results of cross validation showed that even though the conventional trend analysis approach produced a false positive detection rate of ≤5% the composite model outperformed that approach by producing zero cases of false detection. Additionally, the validated model went through an additional test with 42 extra drinking water samples from the same source for an unbiased examination of the model. Finally, the potentials and limitations of this approach were further discussed.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMachine Learning Combined with Non-targeted LC-HRMS Analysis for a Risk Warning System of Chemical Hazards in Drinking Water: A Proof of Conceptnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber426-432nb_NO
dc.source.volume195nb_NO
dc.source.journalTalanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistrynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.talanta.2018.11.039
dc.identifier.cristin1688540
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 243720nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7464,30,21,0
cristin.unitnameMiljøkjemi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal