Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBlagojevic, Dajana
dc.contributor.authorLee, YeonKyeong
dc.contributor.authorXie, Li
dc.contributor.authorBrede, Dag A
dc.contributor.authorNybakken, Line
dc.contributor.authorLind, Ole Christian
dc.contributor.authorTollefsen, Knut Erik
dc.contributor.authorSalbu, Brit
dc.contributor.authorSolhaug, Knut Asbjørn
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Jorunn E
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T08:31:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T08:31:32Z
dc.date.created2019-12-12T08:51:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPhotochemical and Photobiological Sciences. 2019, 18 (8), 1945-1962.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1474-905X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2659431
dc.descriptionEmbargo until 08 July 2020en_US
dc.description.abstractExposure to ambient UV-B radiation may prime protective responses towards various stressors in plants, though information about interactive effects of UV-B and gamma radiation is scarce. Here, we aimed to test whether UV-B exposure could prime acclimatisation mechanisms contributing to tolerance to low-moderate gamma radiation levels in Scots pine seedlings, and concurrently whether simultaneous UV-B and gamma exposure may have an additive adverse effect on seedlings that had previously not encountered either of these stressors. Responses to simultaneous UV-B (0.35 W m−2) and gamma radiation (10.2–125 mGy h−1) for 6 days with or without UV-B pre-exposure (0.35 W m−2, 4 days) were studied across various levels of organisation, as compared to effects of either radiation type. In contrast to UV-B, and regardless of UV-B presence, gamma radiation at ≥42.9 mGy h−1 caused increased formation of reactive oxygen species and reduced shoot length, and reduced root length at 125 mGy h−1. In all experiments there was a gamma dose rate-dependent increase in DNA damage at ≥10.8 mGy h−1, generally with additional UV-B-induced damage. Gamma-induced growth inhibition and gamma- and UV-B-induced DNA damage were still visible 44 days post-irradiation, even at 20.7 mGy h−1, probably due to genomic instability, but this was reversed after 8 months. In conclusion, there was no evidence of a protective effect of UV-B on gamma-induced growth inhibition and DNA damage in Scots pine, and no additive adverse effect of gamma and UV-B radiation on growth in spite of the additional UV-B-induced DNA damage.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.titleNo evidence of a protective or cumulative negative effect of UV-B on growth inhibition induced by gamma radiation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlingsen_US
dc.title.alternativeNo evidence of a protective or cumulative negative effect of UV-B on growth inhibition induced by gamma radiation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlingsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1945-1962en_US
dc.source.volume18en_US
dc.source.journalPhotochemical and Photobiological Sciencesen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/c8pp00491a
dc.identifier.cristin1759721
cristin.unitcode7464,20,13,0
cristin.unitnameØkotoksikologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel