Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLusher, Amy
dc.contributor.authorPettersen, Ragnhild
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T13:07:44Z
dc.date.available2021-05-04T13:07:44Z
dc.date.created2021-05-03T15:31:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-577-7303-8
dc.identifier.issn1894-7948
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2753530
dc.descriptionProject Manager Amy Lusheren_US
dc.description.abstractThis report is an update of data available on primary and secondary discharges of microplastics from sea-based sources to the Norwegian marine environment. Nine broad potential sea-based source categories are relevant to the Norwegian marine environment. These include maritime coatings, maritime traffic, ports marinas and shipyards, decommissioning activities, land-based industry (with discharged into the marine environment), fisheries, aquaculture, petroleum-related activities, and other offshore activities. Sources of primary microplastics can be linked production sites for plastics and paints which have discharges to the sea, or maintenance facilities in coastal areas. Petroleum activities also have discharges of primary microplastics to the ocean. Secondary microplastics can be derived from maintenance, decommissioning and wear and tear across various maritime sectors as well as the breakdown of large plastic items lost or discarded at sea. There is surprisingly little information on the quantities of microplastics released into ocean from coastal or other sea-based sources. Few of the source categories have some information available, and the certainty around the data for all source categories was classed as medium or low. This makes validating emissions values and interpreting the data challenging. As there is little certainty behind the available data, no sea-base source was identified as the biggest contributor. Future research must focus on obtaining comparable empirical data across all potential source categories. This includes calculations of emissions based on actual reported discharge values and comparative environmental investigations. The relative size of the sector may play a role and this should be investigated further.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorsk institutt for vannforskningen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNIVA-rapport
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNIVA-rapport;7568
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMiljødirektoratet-rapport;M-1911
dc.subjectMarin eller kystvannen_US
dc.subjectMarine or costal wateren_US
dc.subjectMiljøgifteren_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental pollutionen_US
dc.subjectPlastforurensningen_US
dc.subjectPlastic pollutionen_US
dc.titleSea-based sources of microplastics to the Norwegian marine environmenten_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderhis report is an update of data available on primary and secondary discharges of microplastics from sea-based sources to the Norwegian marine environment. Nine broad potential sea-based source categories are relevant to the Norwegian marine environment. These include maritime coatings, maritime traffic, ports marinas and shipyards, decommissioning activities, land-based industry (with discharged into the marine environment), fisheries, aquaculture, petroleum-related activities, and other offshore activities. Sources of primary microplastics can be linked production sites for plastics and paints which have discharges to the sea, or maintenance facilities in coastal areas. Petroleum activities also have discharges of primary microplastics to the ocean. Secondary microplastics can be derived from maintenance, decommissioning and wear and tear across various maritime sectors as well as the breakdown of large plastic items lost or discarded at sea. There is surprisingly little information on the quantities of microplastics released into ocean from coastal or other sea-based sources. Few of the source categories have some information available, and the certainty around the data for all source categories was classed as medium or low. This makes validating emissions values and interpreting the data challenging. As there is little certainty behind the available data, no sea-base source was identified as the biggest contributor. Future research must focus on obtaining comparable empirical data across all potential source categories. This includes calculations of emissions based on actual reported discharge values and comparative environmental investigations. The relative size of the sector may play a role and this should be investigated further.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og naturvitenskap: 400en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Mathematics and natural scienses: 400en_US
dc.source.pagenumber104en_US
dc.source.issue7568en_US
dc.identifier.cristin1907839
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel